Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions about
Divorce
Divorce is emotionally and financially devastating. With 40 – 50
% of all marriages ending in divorce, it is important that
everyone has some knowledge about how a divorce works and how to
protect oneself during a divorce. I find that most people are
scared by those things with which they are unfamiliar. Knowledge
is empowerment. The following are several misconceptions of
which one should be aware.
MYTH – If I leave my house, I am giving up my
right to any share of the equity in the home. In essence, I am
abandoning my house.
FACT – As a general rule, anything purchased
during the marriage is marital property and anything owned by
either party prior to the marriage is non-marital property. The
court must equitably allocate property at the time of the
divorce regardless of who is currently possessing the item.
Therefore, if the home was purchased during the marriage,
regardless of title and possession, you are entitled to an
equitable share of the same. You cannot abandon the equity in a
residence merely by moving out.
MYTH – I stayed home during the course of our
marriage to raise my children. Because I contributed less
financially to the marriage, I can expect less than 50% of the
assets from the marriage.
FACT – The very opposite may be true. Your
contribution to the family was the fact that you had a full time
job, which was raising your family. At the time of the divorce,
the court must consider certain factors including your
contribution to raising the children. If you sacrificed your
career by staying home, you should be compensated for the same
by either receiving a greater share of the marital property
(more than 50%) or by your spouse paying maintenance (what is
formerly known as alimony.)
MYTH – I purchased a car or a house, or
obtained debt, in my name alone during the marriage; therefore,
it is mine alone.
FACT – As stated earlier, anything obtained
during the marriage is marital property regardless of the name
on the title, deed, or bill. Therefore, it must be split
equitably between you and your spouse. There are certain
exceptions to this rule, however, such as if your spouse
acquired debt for something unrelated to the marriage, such as a
gift to another person or to fund an addiction such as drugs or
gambling.
MYTH – I cannot move from the home with our
children.
FACT – While you and your spouse are still
married, you each have 100% rights to your children. You may
leave the home and retain your children. However, beware that if
you leave the home with your children with the intention of
putting them in a new school in the middle of the year, there
may be issues. If your spouse subsequently files a motion to
have the children returned home, that spouse may be successful.
The court may find that the best interest of the children is
stability, and that by staying in their home and school
district, stability will be best achieved.
MYTH – I, or my spouse, cannot leave the state
of Illinois with my children for vacation.
FACT – Either spouse may leave the State of
Illinois with their children as long as the other person has an
address and phone number where they can be reached in an
emergency. However, note that neither spouse may permanently
remove the minor children from the State of Illinois without
consent of the other parent or the court.
MYTH – If my spouse is awarded all the debt
from the marriage, the credit card companies cannot try to
collect from me.
FACT – The credit card company was not a party
to the agreement between you and your spouse, and therefore may
attempt to collect from either or both. If the credit card
company is successful in having you satisfy a debt that was
awarded to your spouse in the divorce decree, you may then sue
your ex-spouse to obtain that money you paid out.
Frequently Asked Questions about
Parental Allocation of Responsibilities (formerly known as
Custody and Visitation)
If you were never married to the parent of your child or
children and you and your former significant other have or are
currently dissolving your relationship, there is relief that can
be obtained by the court. These types of situations can be just
as devastating as a divorce, and thus you should have someone
guide you through the process.
MYTH - Joint Allocation of Decision Making,
formerly known as Joint Custody, means that we equally share
parenting time of the children.
FACT – There are many aspects of a
Judgment for Allocation of Decision Making (formerly known as
Custody). The primary considerations are determining who makes
decisions regarding the children. If you make decisions jointly
regarding education, religion, medical and extra-curricular
activities then you are awarded Joint Allocation of Decision
Making. This has nothing to do with Parenting Time, as that is a
separate issue. Just because you have the Joint Allocation of
Decision Making does not mean that you have equal parenting
time.
MYTH - The other party never did anything for
the children and therefore he or she cannot have visitation.
FACT – While there may be an adjustment period
and perhaps some sort of counseling between the parent and the
child, in most cases parenting time will be ordered between a
child and a formerly absent parent.
MYTH– If the father of the child is not listed
on the child’s birth certificate he has no rights to the child.
FACT – The fact that one is not listed as the
father on the birth certificate neither means that he is not
entitled to visitation nor that he does not need to pay child
support. If the Father desires parenting time, he may file a
Petition for Adjudication of Paternity. If he is then determined
to be the father, either by agreement or by a DNA test, he will,
in most circumstances, be entitled to parenting time. If the
Mother desires child support, she may also file a Petition for
Adjudication of Paternity, and then if a man is determined to be
the father of the child, she may request child support.
MYTH – There has never been a child support
order and therefore, the parent does not have to pay child
support until I file requesting the same.
FACT – The Parentage Act of Illinois of 2015
allows the court to award retroactive child support back to the
date of the child’s birth, if requested by a party and if
certain provisions apply. However, the court will consider
several factors, including the length of time between the birth
and the request in determining whether or not it is appropriate
to order such relief.
MYTH - Voluntary Acknowledgement of Paternity –
The father signed a voluntary acknowledgement of paternity but
now he says he is not the father and thus, the court will vacate
the voluntary acknowledgement of paternity.
FACT – A Voluntary Acknowledgement of Paternity
may only be vacated under certain very strict requirements and
most people do not meet those requirements. There is a
limitation period within which one may file a Motion to Vacate
the VAP, so if a father desires to vacate the same he must move
quickly.
MYTH– Because my former significant other and I
lived as husband and wife without getting married, the court can
determine issues of the division of property and debt.
FACT – The State of Illinois does not
acknowledge common law marriage, and there is no provision in
the Illinois Parentage Act of 2015 that allows the court to
allocate property or debt unrelated to a child.

Associations
● Lake County
Bar Association
President 2012-2013 / Ex-Officio
2013-2014
First Vice President 2011-2012
Second Vice President 2010-2011
Secretary 2008-2010
Member at Large 2007-2008
Member 1993 to present
● Family Law
Committee
Family Law Advisory Group (FLAG)
2013-2014
Chair of Subcommittee drafting “Divorce
Pro Se Guidebook” 2014, 2015 and 2016
Subcommittee for drafting of Local Court Rule
for Financial Experts 2016
Subcommittee for planning Guardian Ad Litem/
Child Representative Training 2012, 2014, 2016
● Lake County
Bar Foundation
Board Member 2015-2017
● Association of
Woman’s Attorneys
President 2004-2006
Vice President 2002-2004
Board Member 1998-2002
Member 1994 to present
● Illinois Bar
Association
Member 1993-present
Teen Court Judge 2007-2012